Mathematics vs. natural history

A further belated thought on Lindenmayer & Likens’ complaint that ecology is losing its culture of place-based, empirical natural history in favor of (among other things) mathematics.

My thought was that they’re actually more right than they know. In fact, mathematical modeling has been replacing natural history for decades! No self-respecting natural historian would write anything like this, or this. If only we could go back in time to when it was possible to publish mathematics-free natural history like this and this. But sadly, there’s probably no holding back the mathematical tide that’s been coming in for so long, despite Likens’ long-standing efforts to do so.

Oh, wait…

5 thoughts on “Mathematics vs. natural history

  1. Pingback: A statistical question and answer site for pros « Oikos Blog

  2. Pingback: Musings on the culture of ecology | Dynamic Ecology

  3. Pingback: Friday links: how ecological research has (and hasn’t) changed in the last 30 years, and more | Dynamic Ecology

  4. Pingback: ESA 2013 preview | Dynamic Ecology

  5. Pingback: Stats vs. scouts, polls vs. pundits, and ecology vs. natural history | Dynamic Ecology

Leave a Comment

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.