A further belated thought on Lindenmayer & Likens’ complaint that ecology is losing its culture of place-based, empirical natural history in favor of (among other things) mathematics.
My thought was that they’re actually more right than they know. In fact, mathematical modeling has been replacing natural history for decades! No self-respecting natural historian would write anything like this, or this. If only we could go back in time to when it was possible to publish mathematics-free natural history like this and this. But sadly, there’s probably no holding back the mathematical tide that’s been coming in for so long, despite Likens’ long-standing efforts to do so.
Pingback: A statistical question and answer site for pros « Oikos Blog
Pingback: Musings on the culture of ecology | Dynamic Ecology
Pingback: Friday links: how ecological research has (and hasn’t) changed in the last 30 years, and more | Dynamic Ecology
Pingback: ESA 2013 preview | Dynamic Ecology
Pingback: Stats vs. scouts, polls vs. pundits, and ecology vs. natural history | Dynamic Ecology