Must reads: theoreticians explain themselves to empiricists

Great comment from “lowendtheory” on my post asking for eloquent statements of what it means to be a theorist. Points out two terrific articles–absolute must-reads:

Writing for a highly-empirical ecological audience in The Auk in 1981, Simon Levin, one of the world’s great theoretical ecologists, beautifully articulates what mathematical theory has to offer for empirically-oriented ecologists, and diagnoses the reasons why theoreticians and empiricists alike often fail to appreciate each other.

Writing for an audience of highly-practical engineers earlier this year, Bret Victor has a great blog post about how moving back and forth between different levels of abstraction helps us understand and control complex, incompletely-understood systems. Very relevant to ecology, and illustrated with a detailed, real-world example and cool interactive animations.

7 thoughts on “Must reads: theoreticians explain themselves to empiricists

  1. wow, neat. the levin paper is a really clear statement of what math can and can’t do. does this readership think ecology is still in a descriptive phase?

  2. Pingback: Musings on the culture of ecology | Dynamic Ecology

  3. Pingback: E. O. Wilson vs. math (UPDATEDx5) | Dynamic Ecology

  4. Pingback: What are simple models for? Two must-read views from economics | Dynamic Ecology

  5. Pingback: Hoisted from the comments: Ben Bolker on “other people’s data” | Dynamic Ecology

Leave a Comment

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.