Great comment from “lowendtheory” on my post asking for eloquent statements of what it means to be a theorist. Points out two terrific articles–absolute must-reads:
Writing for a highly-empirical ecological audience in The Auk in 1981, Simon Levin, one of the world’s great theoretical ecologists, beautifully articulates what mathematical theory has to offer for empirically-oriented ecologists, and diagnoses the reasons why theoreticians and empiricists alike often fail to appreciate each other.
Writing for an audience of highly-practical engineers earlier this year, Bret Victor has a great blog post about how moving back and forth between different levels of abstraction helps us understand and control complex, incompletely-understood systems. Very relevant to ecology, and illustrated with a detailed, real-world example and cool interactive animations.
wow, neat. the levin paper is a really clear statement of what math can and can’t do. does this readership think ecology is still in a descriptive phase?
“[D]oes this readership think ecology is still in a descriptive phase?”
I can’t speak for all of the readership, but I sure don’t! 😉 Actually, I suspect most readers would agree with me on that…
Just a heads up: The Auk link is broken now, and if you are referring to the paper Mathematics, Ecology, and Ornithology I believe the year in the citation should be 1980 😉
Great paper, btw! Thanks for pointing it out!
Pingback: Musings on the culture of ecology | Dynamic Ecology
Pingback: E. O. Wilson vs. math (UPDATEDx5) | Dynamic Ecology
Pingback: What are simple models for? Two must-read views from economics | Dynamic Ecology
Pingback: Hoisted from the comments: Ben Bolker on “other people’s data” | Dynamic Ecology