Will blogging change how ecologists communicate? In economics, it already has.

Pleased to announce that I’ve just gotten my third peer-reviewed paper out of blogging. This one is a short invited piece for a forthcoming special issue of Ideas in Ecology and Evolution on the future of scientific publishing.

In the paper, I list some reasons why blogs are a useful complement to peer reviewed papers, and discuss the role of blogs in economics. In economics, blogging has become an absolutely crucial means of communication and evaluation of ideas. So much so that it can be argued that a single once-obscure economics blogger (Scott Sumner of The Money Illusion) may just have saved the entire US economy. Yes, really–read my paper for more details! I conclude by asking why the “blogging culture” is so different in economics vs. ecology, and speculate on whether things will ever change in ecology.

The whole special issue should be interesting. Stefano Allesina’s paper modeling the consequences of alternative peer review systems is already up.

Like all IEE papers, my paper will be open access once it’s published (should be soon). But in the meantime, the page proof (which needs no corrections) is here.

13 thoughts on “Will blogging change how ecologists communicate? In economics, it already has.

  1. I liked the paper, very interesting and you make some great points. I’d add another reason to blog, at least for those of us who teach; so often our students don’t really understand what it is that academics do on a day to day basis, how and why they do research, what conferences are for, why we write papers, apply for funding, etc. I’d like to think that my blog entries give my students a sense of what I am above and beyond someone who lectures, runs field trips and grades their work.

      • Well, understanding that ideas in science change and are not static notions from text books is certainly important! And also that they themselves could contribute to the development of a field.

      • Yes, I actually do use the zombie ideas thing in my undergraduate population ecology class, mostly to teach students that they need to think critically about what they read and hear, not just take it for granted because it was in a textbook or because someone with “Dr.” in front of their name said it. Also about the importance of doing the math rather than just trusting your pre-mathematical intuitions (a big reason the zombie IDH survives is because of its intuitive appeal).

  2. Pingback: Musings on the culture of ecology | Dynamic Ecology

  3. Pingback: On the tone and content of this blog (feedback encouraged) | Dynamic Ecology

  4. Pingback: What are simple models for? Two must-read views from economics | Dynamic Ecology

  5. Pingback: Whither the landscape ecology blogger? | Landscape Ecology 2.0

  6. Pingback: Friday links: why your work will never make the textbooks, ELA only semi-saved, crab monster poetry, and more | Dynamic Ecology

  7. Pingback: There are ecology blogs, but no ecology blogosphere | Dynamic Ecology

  8. Pingback: Dynamic Ecology live at Virginia Tech on April 7–help me write my talk! | Dynamic Ecology

  9. Pingback: Post-publication review is here to stay–for the scientific 1% | Dynamic Ecology

  10. Pingback: Challenges and best practice in online science communication | OpenQuaternary Discussions

Leave a Comment

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.