Friday links: bad news vs. good news (UPDATEDx2)

Also this week: mostly bad news. Sorry. Most of the good news is at the end.

From Jeremy:

Black scientists on their own experiences in science, and what they’d like to see from their colleagues and institutions.

Pandemic experts are not ok.

Sam Perrin interviews statistical ecologist Joseph Chipperfield and colleagues about the problems with trying to use species distribution models to forecast the COVID-19 pandemic. Here’s a recent related post from Nick Record and colleagues on the ethics of forecasting COVID-19.

Like many of you, I was horrified to read the news that students in the US on F-1 and M-1 visas may not stay in the US if their school goes online-only and they take a fully online course load. I’m from the US originally but I’ve been in Canada for 16 years, so I’m not well placed to offer advice on what to do about this. Would welcome links in the comments to informed advice about what students, their professors, and their institutions can do to minimize the damage this appalling policy will inflict to both individuals and institutions. Students facing deportation because of this policy should certainly talk to an immigration lawyer if they can. Here’s a thread from Chris Marsicano on concrete steps you can take to try to get the policy changed. And here’s Sara Goodman offering to teach an in-person independent study course to any international student at her institution who faces deportation because of this policy; perhaps others could do the same at their own institutions? Harvard and MIT have sued the ICE to try to stop the new policy. UPDATE: at a hearing before a judge today, the US government agreed to rescind ICE and DHS rules barring international students from staying in the US if they’re taking exclusively online courses. I know nothing more beyond what’s in the linked tweet, sorry. /end update UPDATE #2: This WSJ article notes that DHS is likely to try again with some sort of restrictions on “newly enrolling” international students, so stay tuned. But the Harvard/MIT lawsuit remains open, so if DHS does try again, it sounds like they’d end up back before the same judge. /end update #2

Speaking of teaching in-person US college classes this fall: an argument that colleges are more like bars and cruise ships than like elementary schools.

The New Yorker covers Scott Alexander’s deletion of his long-running, high-profile blog Slate Star Codex. Alexander deleted his blog because a NYT reporter was planning to write a (positive) article about it that would reveal Alexander’s real last name. I previously linked to Alexander’s reasons for taking down his blog, so I wanted to link to this as well. Speaking purely personally, as someone who’s not a member of the self-identified “rationalist” community and who only read Slate Star Codex very occasionally, I found much of the linked story rather off-putting. But YMMV.

A high-profile paper in evolutionary biology (Jiang & Rausher 2018 Nature Plants) has been retracted. Second author Mark Rausher requested the retraction because his lab was trying to do follow-up experiments and could not replicate several of the results reported in the paper. First author Peng Jiang is no longer in Rausher’s lab and could not be contacted either by the journal or by Retraction Watch. Kudos to Mark Rausher for doing the right thing and requesting the retraction once it became clear that the results weren’t reliable.

I’m late to this, but here’s a small bit of good news. In a preprint posted at the end of May, Functional Ecology executive editor Charles Fox reported that BES journals have not seen any shift in the gender balance or geography of submitting authors since COVID-19 disruptions began. I’ll be curious whether that continues to hold true; I hope it does.

Congratulations to ASN award winners Tia-Lynn Ashman, Sharon Strauss, Beatriz Willink, M. Catherine Duryea, and Erik Svensson.

The joint editorial board of Ecology and Ecological Monographs is looking for new editors. They’ve issued an open invitation for expressions of interest; here’s the short online form. Seems like a good way to cast a broad net and help identify a strong, diverse pool of candidates, complementary to other ways of identifying candidates.

4 thoughts on “Friday links: bad news vs. good news (UPDATEDx2)

  1. Clemson has determined that international students will meet the ‘in person’ requirements if they sign up for research credit (which solves the issue for most students in ecology+), independent study if the professor actually meets in person with the student,* or a special topics or similar class.* At the moment, we are still planning on starting the term with a combination of hybrid and online classes and professors are being given some latitude as to which options they’d offer for their classes. A student would have to be careful not to enroll in all online. The ICE policy doesn’t say how many ‘in person’ credits are needed, so we are assuming 1 is enough for now. To buffer for the worst case, where the term starts hybrid but forces a shift to all online, it makes sense for advisors to ensure their students have some research credit. At our field station, we are prepared to absorb some courses from campus if needed so we can provide in person classes with a small number of students that would be ‘in a bubble’ with field station housing. We’ve made sure that all our college leadership knows that is an option. That’s not a solution that would work for 2500 international students, but it is a place where field stations could be helpful if needed.

    More importantly in the short term, we emailed/phoned on Tuesday that we had their backs and would devise solutions to assure they could stay even if we didn’t know at the moment what the solutions were. Clemson held a town hall yesterday afternoon and that’s further helped ease some anxiety.

    For students who might have to return home to locations which also have terrible leadership, this policy increases anxiety multifold.

    *Apparently later visa applications (OPT/Green card/etc) include interviews and if the state dept asks “Did you really meet in person?” we have to ensure the students can say yes. Else future visa status is compromised.

    • Of course, SC has the 3rd highest rate of covid cases/capita in the last week, and our location on the coast is even higher than the state average, so whether anyone wants to come here is debatable. But it might be still be better than the alternative. shrug.

  2. Pingback: Friday links: another retraction for Jonathan Pruitt, journal cover art, and more | Dynamic Ecology

Leave a Comment

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.